OBJECT LEVEL EVIDENCE / MIDDLE

Identify the object first.

Object / collection no.
UM 33-58-133
Edition and text ID
Billa 30 / CDLI P282711
Findspot / archive
Šibaniba, modern Tell Billa; Aššur-kašid archive
Dating
Middle Assyrian, month Muhur-ilāni; day partly broken
Document type
Receipt
Read these lines
Obverse 1-7; reverse 10-16; top 17-20

Open the original institutional object or text edition. This catalogue link provides an identified record; the archive has not independently collated ancient signs or verified every translation choice.

ATTRIBUTED ANCIENT-TEXT EXCERPTS

Read the edited lines side by side.

Transliteration represents cuneiform signs in modern notation; it is not the original cuneiform image. The two English columns are editorial cues and interpretation, not a new translation or verbatim reproduction of the scholarly edition. Check the linked publication for the full line sequence and the specialist English rendering.

Provincial barley entry, questioned obligation and broken names

Very short quoted excerpts by line, with original editorial glosses
Edition lineTransliteration excerptEnglish reading cueInterpretation and uncertainty
Obverse 1attested2 ANŠE ŠE mu-la-u₂The editor records a barley amount and an additional payment phrase.Its economic nature is apparent, while the precise imposition on people remains qualified.The compact excerpt retains ancient measure signs rather than a modern unit conversion.
Obverse 5queriedem^{?}-du-niAn editorial question mark qualifies the word describing the imposition or obligation.The precise legal nature of the demand cannot be stated as certain.A queried sign or reading is evidence of uncertainty in the modern edition.
Reverse 10restored[^{m}x]-⸢x-x-x⸣The line preserves lost or unreadable portions of a personal name.A missing name must not be reconstructed into an invented individual.Brackets and x indicate missing or unidentified signs. This example is not a readable full name.

Source: Jacob Jan de Ridder, ATMAP/TCMA edition of Billa 30 (2020), CC BY-SA 3.0. Licence details. Read the complete original edition. Only short attributed samples are included; no full scholarly translation is mirrored.

The account is a receipt; an obligation verb is queried and the witnesses and some date signs are broken.

Reading marks: [ ] = lost text supplied by editors; x = unidentified sign; # = damaged sign; ? = uncertain reading; raised corner marks = partly damaged signs. Learn the notation or view all objects together.

Provenance beyond the capital

The ATMAP/TCMA edition of Billa 30 identifies CDLI P282711 and collection UM 33-58-133, from the Aššur-kašid archive at Šibaniba, now Tell Billa. Its findspot is important evidence that Middle Assyrian record keeping was not confined to the city of Aššur. The tablet is listed as a receipt and preserves a dating formula as well as damaged witness and personal-name sections. It should not be treated as if its geography were uncertain just because some wording is broken.

A provincial grain entry

The edited obverse concerns a barley quantity associated with the palace and the men of Šibaniba, with a named family connection; the reading of the imposition is itself marked uncertain. The document's date and witnesses are partly damaged. These details make it a practical example of how a small account raises questions about the local economy and institutional obligations without revealing all the real-life events behind the text.

What we can and cannot reconstruct

A grain obligation entered in a receipt points to a social system of storing, demanding and acknowledging goods. It does not automatically mean that every household in the town paid the same amount, that a delivery is fully verified or that the broken witnesses can be confidently named. A modern reconstruction must distinguish certain tablet signs, proposed restorations and scholarly explanations rather than flatten them into a smooth narrative.

The Billa record gives a provincial example of grain administration rather than another document from the capital. Measurement, named responsibility and a recorded transfer were practical needs outside royal centres too.

Its significance lies in a particular transaction connected with that place. It broadens a history otherwise dominated by palace monuments, without making one receipt a complete account of a province's production.

Next reading at line level

Compare the obverse quantity and status words with the published transliteration, review the reverse witness formula and retain the brackets that mark lost names or signs. Scholars could then compare other securely located Tell Billa receipts to ask whether practices changed between households or periods. This site supplies the edition route and a cautious original introduction, not a newly completed linguistic collation of all twenty written lines.

Cultivation, storage and movement lay behind a grain transfer, even when the text names only the party responsible at one point. Explaining those necessary operations supplies context.

Unrecorded stages must remain distinct from attested detail. The article can explain barley's role in provisioning without inventing a shipment route or treating the recorded quantity as a whole harvest. A small account makes one part of institutional work concrete.

CONNECTED RESEARCH

Explore the concordance.

These are editorial reading links, not a claim that different documents describe the same event.

Evidence trail

This introduction draws on the following sources: [1][2]. Section reading trails highlight selected references where a more precise relationship has been recorded. Unmapped passages and other references remain at article level; these trails are not a sentence-by-sentence verification. Editorial guidance is identified in the text.

Go to the evidence

Sources & further reading

  • 1
    Edition of primary cuneiform tablet

    Billa 30, barley receipt from Shibaniba, CDLI P282711, UM 33-58-133

    Oracc ATMAP/TCMA, Jacob Jan de Ridder

    Tell Billa/Shibaniba, Ashur-kashid archive. Barley payment, witnesses and date, with explicitly broken names and uncertain imposition terminology.. Recorded source check: 2026-10-30.
  • 2
    Specialist edited primary administrative text corpus

    Archival Texts of the Middle Assyrian Period (ATMAP/TCMA)

    Oracc / Jacob Jan de Ridder and project contributors

    Online corpus with transliterations, translations, findspots, bibliographies and provenance notes. Its 3,000+ texts are a corpus description, not representative of every inhabitant.. Recorded source check: 2026-10-29.

A foundation to build on

This introduction was compiled from the linked sources and has not received specialist peer review. It is intended as a route into further research. Read how corrections and reviews are handled.

Prepare a correction or contribution